Skip to main content

How Two Montana Democrats Wish They Hadn't Spent Election Day

Late afternoon on Election Day, before the dismal returns began coming in, I was copied on an email from a friend of a friend, a guy I’ve never met in person, but who has been a reader of this blog for several years.

John’s story was terrifying when I first read it, but as that unhappy evening wore on, it grew into a sort of metaphor for what was happening to the rest of us.

Trust me, John’s night was worse than ours. He and his wife Julie spent it in fear for their lives.

They had been living their dream retirement in the wilderness of Western Montana, on a mountainous property four miles from town, but two miles from their own mailbox. To them, this was an idyllic lifestyle, a home in the woods, exactly what they wanted. But in recent months, it had all turned dark, and the blame is entirely Trump’s.

As long as a year ago, John had written privately to several friends, including me, about the extreme Trumpy-ness of his adopted region. There was trepidation, bordering on dread, even then.

Somehow, their accents, their education, and their general worldliness touched off a nerve in their new community, and branded them as what? Elite? Liberal? Intelligent? Whatever it was, they attracted an unexpected animosity that brought real anxiety into their everyday lives.

One night in late August, a neighbor — whom they’d never met — fired four rounds from a shotgun, the last one into their deck. The pellets narrowly missed their three terrified cats and came alarmingly close to John in his pajamas and slippers.

When John confronted this neighbor, he was greeted with three blows to the face, one resulting in possible eye damage. He was called a “liberal faggot,” and told that “the guns come out in November,” presumably referring to the election. This was followed by the bizarre claim that "I talk to Donald Trump every day, and he supports me," as if that explained everything. And perhaps it does.

In this particular part of the country, legal recourse for such behavior is largely unavailable. The law enforcement community does not respond to reports of gunshots — if they did, they’d be backlogged into the next decade. Besides, as one deputy put it, “You moved to Montana without a gun? Are you crazy?”

By now it was clear John and Julie needed to rethink their retirement. In October, they put their home up for sale.

For the first open house showing, the neighbor festooned the property line with huge Trump signs, flags reading “Fuck Biden,” a t-shirt depicting assault weapons, and a sign saying “Deport them all.”

The placement of these items was strategic, intended to discourage potential buyers. The open house, unsurprisingly, was a bust.

A week later, John opened his mailbox to find a hangman’s noose, a fresh animal turd, and a cardboard sign reading “J+J Your dead 54,” but no mail.

The “J+J” came from the sign in front of their property. Apparently, “54” is cop-speak for a dead body. When Julie noted that the sender couldn’t spell, the deputy at the scene asked her what was misspelled.

Meanwhile, with the election approaching, Trump’s campaign was ramping the violent rhetoric up to eleven. The atmosphere in many parts of the state, including theirs, became charged with menace. As John put it:

…[T]here's no talking to Trumpers unless you glorify Trump by the time you utter your second sentence. If you emit the slightest liberal funk, Republicans will steer the subject to violence against your person. And it isn't generic, like "I hope you die." It's specific — descriptions of the guns, knives, ammunition, and so forth. You will be lucky to get back in your car or into your home because a punch to the face is milliseconds away. A conversation with a Republican will last ten seconds, max, and if you haven't declared your loyalty to Trump by then, you will be greeted with violence.

They managed to get several restraining orders against the neighbor, the first of them begrudgingly issued by a judge who’s an open Trump supporter. The neighbor’s guns were to be temporarily confiscated, though it was never confirmed that the order was carried out. Meanwhile, they hurriedly installed spotlights and motion detectors on their property.

On election night, John was sufficiently edgy that he wrote out the basic story I’m repeating here, and sent it to some friends, alarming all of us. He was wondering, quite explicitly, if he and Julie would survive the night.

I’m happy to report that the night was uneventful, though they heard at least eighteen gunshots, presumably in celebration. Still, they were relieved, even as they understood that a reasonably decent democracy might soon be on life support.

Their situation remains fraught until they can sell and leave. Lawyers are now engaged. John now owns a gun for the first time in his life. This is who we are now.

Metaphors are rarely perfect, but given the electoral spasms of that night, this neighbor from hell seems an archetype for what much of our population has become, almost without our knowing.

Who knew we were living among tens of millions of ignorant, racist, misogynist dupes? Yes, we knew they were there, but we had no idea there were so many, or how brainwashed they actually were. Vast swathes of the electorate have been steeped so long in blatant lies and malicious propaganda, they fail to even perceive their own interests, let alone vote with them in mind.

John and Julie understand this better than most. They spent election night actually living out the terror that the rest of us were just starting to imagine.

Our imaginations are quickly catching up with them. 


Comments

  1. I suppose it's a good thing that every Trump supporter in Montana doesn't think that people with differing opinions have no right to live. It would have been more than one lunatic neighbor who acted, scary as that must have been.

    While there are far too many right-wing nut bags, it didn't take long for the left-wing nutbags to start declaring election fraud with all the evidence that the right had in the last election.

    Nutbags gonna be nutty. Nuttin you can do about it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't understand why the neighbor wasn't arrested. Even if the police don't respond to reports of gunshots, punching somebody in the face is assault, and shooting at an occupied structure is a real crime, not the same as firing off guns into the air. Making threats is also illegal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I suspect that things could get far worse for them, in the unlikely event that the local sheriff decided to comply with the law and arrest the guy, because the other neighbors would be really pissed off.

      Delete
  3. The root of the problem is... Fox Fifth-Column News

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If You Were Putin, What Would You Do?

  S o let’s say you’re Vladimir Putin. Scary, I know. But let’s just say you’d been trained by the old KGB to hate the United States with a white-hot passion that you’ve had on simmer since long before you became dictator. It’s a hate you were taught in the Brezhnev years, which were almost as bad as Stalin’s but with mass death ruled out, more or less. You nursed the hate through the convulsions of the early nineties, when your beloved Soviet Union was scrapped and replaced with economic chaos and widespread privation, which the Russian people somehow endured, as usual. Then finally, in 2000, you got your shot. You took over the whole country, and your hate was given room to breathe. Still you took your time. Fourteen years till you “annexed” Crimea and moved on the Donbass. Two more years before you engineered Brexit and the self-destruction of the UK, the same year you stole a U.S. presidential election for a pliable con man you’ve owned for three decades...

DEI-Bashing and the Battle for the Soul of Big Law

  T here was a time, not long ago, when a major corporate law firm would look to burnish its “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” credentials in the marketplace. At which point that firm might hire a writer like, say, me. It was a given that Big Law firms needed to become more diverse, at least if they wanted to stay relevant in a work environment that was no longer male, white, straight, and old. Firms everywhere invested real money in the recruitment, training, and promotion of lawyers from widely varied backgrounds, and they paid people like me to brag about it to the world. Every firm needed a DEI page on its website. Some wanted printed brochures. Some wanted advertising. Most wanted the legal community, especially law schools, to know about their diversity efforts. Law schools were by then rating firms by their DEI “scores,” and the firms with the best scores were getting the pick of the litter from the graduating classes. What I liked about the work was...

What Sort of Pro Bono Work is Big Law Signing Up For?

  B ig Law is on the hot seat. Major firms have unexpectedly been thrust into the front lines of the war against Trump, and all their options are bad. I wrote about this two weeks ago, and since then a slew of big firms have either made a deal with the devil or joined the side of the angels. On the minus side, all but one of the top twenty firms have either taken the “deal” or stayed silent. I personally think they’re playing a bad hand badly. On the plus side — beyond those top twenty behemoths — there are hundreds of very large firms who have taken a stand, of sorts, against the junta. If you’re interested in keeping score , you can do so, but the whole thing keeps getting weirder. As we watch these “deals” being made, the one common denominator — and the most publicized aspect — is the “pro bono” work these firms are committing to. About a billion dollars’ worth of lawyering is available to be used in “conservative” causes. What does this mean? What ...